Asked to react to the letter, Tarik Jasarevic, a spokesman for the W.H.O., replied in an electronic mail that the staff of specialists that had gone to China “is doing work on its entire report as nicely as an accompanying summary report, which we understand will be issued at the same time in a couple of weeks.”
The open letter famous that the W.H.O.’s study was a joint effort by a crew of exterior authorities, chosen by the worldwide health group, who labored alongside with Chinese researchers, and that the team’s report will have to be agreed on by all. The letter emphasised that the team was denied accessibility to some data and did not examine laboratories in China.
March 6, 2021, 6:57 p.m. ET
Findings by the workforce, the letter said, “while likely helpful to a constrained extent, signify neither the official placement of the W.H.O. nor the end result of an unrestricted, independent investigation.”
Devoid of naming him, the letter criticized Peter Daszak, an skilled in animal conditions and their connection to human health, who is the head of EcoHealth Alliance. The letter connected to article content about Dr. Daszak and said he had formerly said his conviction that a pure origin of the virus was most very likely.
Dr. Daszak stated the letter’s thrust to investigate a lab origin for the virus was a placement “supported by political agendas.”
“I strongly urge the worldwide neighborhood to hold out for the publication of the report from the W. H.O. mission,” he additional.
Filippa Lentzos, a senior lecturer in science and international safety, at King’s Faculty London, and one of the signers of the letter, stated, “I consider in order to get a credible investigation, it has to be much more of a worldwide effort in the sense that it ought to be taken to the U.N. Normal Assembly wherever all the nations of the environment are represented and can vote on no matter if or not to give a mandate to the U.N. secretary general, to have out this kind of investigation.”